The Grammar of Love
“Love has its own language—understood only
by those who experience it”
Written by— Jezreel
Madsa
Love and language are
some of the things that humans cannot live without. Deprived of these two would
ultimately make one live no more, than a person who post on facebook without
having a registered account.
Essentially, these two are integral to the life of every person. They
are, so to speak, the ingredients thereby constitute the truest sense of being
a human individual.
Apparently, there is
not a single day much less an hour where we barely speak, let alone love. In
every endeavor we make, or task we accomplish—we always blend the whole thing
with love and language. Inasmuch as it is language that enables us to
communicate our ideas and it is love that empowers us to do harder things with
commensurate ease.
Having said those
things above, haven’t you asked
yourself with one question: Does love in
of itself have its own language? That is to say, does love have its own distinct
language different than the language we use to speak and communicate with
corresponding linguistic and phonetic symbols?
My grandpa who already
had passed away many years ago used to remind me that love is a verb and it
means getting the broom and sweep the dust out of the house; or get a wet scrap
of cloth and mop the floor from upstairs all the way down; or prepare food on
the table for the people you love. I mulled over what he said, yet I was a bit
cynical that time. I was pretty sure that it was just an obvious stunt pulled
by my grandpa to keep me do the work. But when I began to deliberately analyze
the whole thing, I somehow discovered that he was right. Truly, love is a
dynamic kind of thing or something that is concretely visible, not an abstract
set of words easily spoken out by everyone.
In a ‘love-relationship’
context, we often hear bunches of men including myself—who woo a girl by means
of poetry—using well-embellished rhetoric to win the heart of the girl. It is
believe notwithstanding by many people in general that if you cannot open your
mouth and speak that ‘language of love’ [as it were] you would have zero chance
to prove you truly love the girl.
In most cases, however,
words are nothing but words—a mere vehicle used by people to get what they like
and and not what they truly want. But is love better expressed in words? I for
one believe that it can be exemplified a way better through actions. The true
language of love constitutes not of a set of words we use in speech, but is a
sacrificial kind of passion one delightfully does without asking something in
return.
How about in family
context, how does the language of love best exemplified? As students, we could manifest our love to
our parents by means of following their directions and advice. We show by
recompensing them with their efforts—to make us become professionals one day.
Having good grades and acquiring good reputation in the class may not be enough
to pay off the sweat our parents have shed to give us a better life, but they
are nevertheless an excellent token of our gratefulness towards their labors. Folks,
love is neither abstract nor static, it is rather concrete and dynamic. The
language of love is a tangible action done out willingly in accordance with the
grammar of sincerity and sacrifice.
Comments
Post a Comment